Australia vs India, 1st T20I: Henriques questions whether Chahal was ‘like-for-like’ replacement for Jadeja


Australia all-rounder Moises Henriques questioned whether Yuzvendra Chahal was a like-for-like concussion replacement to Ravindra Jadeja after the latter got his on his helmet during the first T20I of the 3-match series in Canberra on Friday. Henriques said there’s no question about the need for replacement but, going forward, concussion substitutes should be ‘like-for-like’.

Yuzvendra Chahal bowled during Australia’s chase despite the leg-spinner not having been picked in India’s playing XI for the T20I series opener. Chahal was named as concussion substitute for Ravindra Jadeja after the all-rounder took a blow to the head in the final over of the Indian innings.

1st T20I: Match Report | Match Highlights

Jadeja was not assessed by Team India physio immediately after the hit as he continued to bat while braving a hamstring injury as well and helped India to 161 in 20 overs. However, Jadeja did not walk out to take the field in the 2nd innings.

Chahal went on to bowl 4 overs and picked up 3 crucial wickets and ended up with the Man of the Match award. While Chahal is a specialist bowler, Jadeja has evolved into one of the top all-rounders across all formats in the recent past.

“Once a decision has been made you just move forward and do what you can to win the fixture. When you’ve got professionals in place to make those decisions, and there’s no doubt he got a knock on the helmet, so from my point of view I do like to try and see the best in everyone,” Henriques told the press on Friday.

“But having said that, whether it was a like-for-like replacement, that’s the only thing moving forward, that’s the question we’d like to see.

“Like for like, from my point of view, it would definitely be one’s an allrounder and a gun fielder, and the other one is an out-and-out bowler who bats [at] 11. That’s the only thing from my point of view. I’d like to look into if that’s a like-for-like decision.”

According to the ICC rule book, “In assessing whether the nominated Concussion Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the ICC Match Referee should consider the likely role the concussed player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Concussion Replacement.”

There was quite a few reactions to India’s concussion substitute as Justin Langer was seen having an animated discussion with match referee David Boon just before the start of the Australian chase. While captain Aaron Finch played down the controversy, Kohli said Jadeja felt dizzy after heading to the dressing room during the mid-innings break.

Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar, speaking to India Today, pointed out that there was too much “unnecessary noise” despite the match referee taking the call to allow the concussion substitute.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *